Sir Isaac Newton
Baruch Spinoza
Immanuel Kant
Nikola Tesla
George Frideric Handel
Leonardo da Vinci
Michelangelo
Orville Wright
Wilbur Wright
I could go on, but all great discoveries and innovations can typically be traced back to dependence upon some achievements made by men of great minds that would not have achieved such had they been married and distracted. Einstein, famously, was a very cold husband, had he been as devoted as the ideal then he certainly would not have achieved what he did. As a model for humanity as a whole, certainly I cannot say that a society would be able to function had it no men who married and had children. Certainly some level of stability and tradition must be in place by and large. But what does the neoreactionary movement need at the moment more, simply, than bright minds and leaders, who can see through to the ultimate. Hence, the rise in "game" and pick up type advocacy amongst neoreactionaries seems somewhat odd - since the kind of men women are attracted to, and the kind of men who care for the time of women (of whom there are nearly none worth the time), are not the kind of men who can truly benefit the world or produced the height of insight required of the advancement of a highly intelligent species.
The kind of women men are attracted to are also typically not those who have the highest IQ. Many of the traits that are preferred are those indicative of double digit IQs only. A model of artificial reproduction and positive eugenics in this regard would be ideal. I still think that the best way to raise children is with a traditional family structure, but we must be prudent in what we ask of the future, and what we choose in the present.
No comments:
Post a Comment